This is an
analysis of the 2010
Giannoulias won the unadjusted exit poll by 51-47%, a 144,000 vote margin.
The True Vote Model indicates that
he won by 49.7-47.1%, a 97,000 margin.
The Final Illinois
2010 Exit Poll indicated that 56% of the votes recorded were cast by returning
Obama voters and 38% by returning McCain voters.
The 2008
Presidential True Vote analysis indicates that Obama won nationally by 58-40% -
a 22 million vote margin (only 9.5 million was recorded). Forcing the State and National Exit Polls to match the recorded vote
is standard operating procedure. In order to force a match in 2004 and 2008,
the exit pollsters had to assume an impossible number of returning Bush voters
from the previous election. The Final Exit Poll is forced to match the
recorded vote by adjusting the returning voter mix and/or the vote shares. In
2004, the impossible 43% returning Bush 2000 share insufficient to match the
recorded vote. The exit pollsters had to increase his vote shares as well.
The returning voter mix should
reflect the previous election True Vote, not the recorded vote.
Assume a) 60% turnout of Obama voters, b) 70% McCain turnout and c) an even spit between Gianoulias and Kirk among new voters and returning
third-party voters. The True Vote Model indicates that if Giannoulias
captured just 82% of returning Obama voters, he won by approximately 97,000
votes. With an 80% share of returning Obama voters, he won by 17,000 votes.
As in the
The
sensitivity analysis tables display Giannoulias’ vote
share and margin for various scenarios: 1) Obama 2008 voter turnout in 2010 , 2) Giannoulias’ shares of
returning Obama voters and 3) Kirk shares of returning McCain voters.
Exit Poll Oddities
The Final
2010 Illinois Exit Poll is eerily similar to the Wisconsin amd
Giannoulias
had a 54-37% lead among the 29% of voters who decided in the month before the
election. He won the “When Decided” category by 49.4-46.1%.
The
Democrats led in Party ID by 44-31% over the Republicans. Democrats virtually
always win when they have an edge in Party-ID. Kirk needed an implausible 61%
of Independents.
Giannoulias
tied Kirk among the 94% who were returning Obama and
McCain voters in the “How Voted in 2008” category,
At the same
time, to believe the
You must
also believe that just 61% of Obama voters returned to vote while 70% of McCain
voters did.
|
2008 National Exit Poll
(recorded vote) |
|
2008 National True Vote |
|
|
||||||
|
Voted
2004 |
Mix |
Obama |
McCain |
Other |
|
Voted
2004 |
Mix |
Obama |
McCain |
Other |
|
DNV |
13% |
71% |
27% |
2% |
|
DNV |
12.4% |
71% |
27% |
2% |
|
Kerry |
37% |
89% |
9% |
1% |
|
Kerry |
46.8% |
89% |
9% |
1% |
|
Bush |
46% |
17% |
82% |
1% |
|
Bush |
39.7% |
17% |
82% |
1% |
|
Other |
4% |
66% |
20% |
8% |
|
Other |
1.1% |
66% |
20% |
8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
52.6% |
45.4% |
1.4% |
|
Total |
100% |
57.9% |
40.3% |
1.2% |
2010
|
Exit
Poll (recorded vote) |
|
97.5% |
Turnout |
2010 |
|
Vote share |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
Recorded |
Share |
Alive |
Rate |
Voted |
Mix |
Giannoulias |
Kirk |
Other |
Giannoulias |
Kirk |
Other |
|
Obama |
3420 |
61.9% |
3335 |
61% |
2034 |
56.3% |
79% |
18% |
3% |
1607 |
366 |
61 |
|
McCain |
2032 |
36.8% |
1981 |
70% |
1387 |
38.4% |
3% |
93% |
4% |
42 |
1290 |
55 |
|
Other |
72 |
1.3% |
70 |
65% |
46 |
1.3% |
50% |
50% |
0% |
23 |
23 |
0 |
|
DNV |
|
|
|
- |
149 |
4.1% |
30% |
70% |
0% |
45 |
105 |
0 |
|
Total |
5523 |
100.0% |
5385 |
64% |
3616 |
100.0% |
47.5% |
49.3% |
3.2% |
1716 |
1783 |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
(67) |
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True
Vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote share |
|
|
True Vote |
|
|
|
2008 |
True |
Share |
Alive |
Turnout |
Voted |
Mix |
Giannoulias |
Kirk |
Other |
Giannoulias |
Kirk |
Other |
|
Obama |
3424 |
62.0% |
3339 |
60% |
2003 |
55.4% |
82% |
15% |
3% |
1643 |
300 |
60 |
|
McCain |
2027 |
36.7% |
1976 |
70% |
1383 |
38.3% |
3% |
93% |
4% |
42 |
1287 |
55 |
|
Other |
72 |
1.3% |
70 |
70% |
49 |
1.4% |
50% |
50% |
0% |
25 |
25 |
0 |
|
DNV |
|
|
|
- |
180 |
5.0% |
50% |
50% |
0% |
90 |
90 |
0 |
|
Total |
5523 |
100.0% |
5385 |
64% |
3616 |
100.0% |
49.7% |
47.1% |
3.2% |
1799 |
1702 |
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
47.6% |
49.2% |
3.2% |
1719 |
1779 |
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
|
Giannoulias Share |
|
|
|
|
|
Giannoulias Share |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama |
|
Giannoulias%Obama |
|
|
|
Kirk % |
|
Giannoulias%Obama |
|
|
||
|
|
Turnout |
79% |
80% |
81% |
82% |
83% |
|
McCain |
79% |
80% |
81% |
82% |
83% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68% |
50.2% |
50.9% |
51.5% |
52.1% |
52.7% |
|
89% |
49.6% |
50.2% |
50.7% |
51.3% |
51.8% |
|
|
66% |
49.7% |
50.3% |
50.9% |
51.5% |
52.1% |
|
90% |
49.2% |
49.8% |
50.3% |
50.9% |
51.4% |
|
|
64% |
49.2% |
49.7% |
50.3% |
50.9% |
51.5% |
|
91% |
48.8% |
49.4% |
50.0% |
50.5% |
51.1% |
|
|
62% |
48.6% |
49.2% |
49.8% |
50.3% |
50.9% |
|
92% |
48.5% |
49.0% |
49.6% |
50.1% |
50.7% |
|
|
60% |
48.1% |
48.6% |
49.2% |
49.7% |
50.3% |
|
93% |
48.1% |
48.6% |
49.2% |
49.7% |
50.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giannoulias Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
Giannoulias Margin |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68% |
140 |
185 |
231 |
276 |
321 |
|
89% |
88 |
128 |
168 |
208 |
248 |
|
|
66% |
99 |
143 |
187 |
231 |
275 |
|
90% |
60 |
100 |
140 |
180 |
220 |
|
|
64% |
58 |
101 |
144 |
187 |
229 |
|
91% |
32 |
72 |
112 |
152 |
192 |
|
|
62% |
18 |
59 |
100 |
142 |
183 |
|
92% |
5 |
45 |
85 |
125 |
165 |
|
|
60% |
(23) |
17 |
57 |
97 |
137 |
|
93% |
(23) |
17 |
57 |
97 |
137 |
Illinois 2010 Senate Exit Poll
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Giannoulias |
Kirk |
Other |
|
|
|
Recorded |
3616 |
1719 |
1779 |
117 |
|
|
|
Share |
100% |
47.6% |
49.2% |
3.3% |
|
|
|
Unadj. exit poll |
2325 Resp |
1187 |
1094 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
Share |
51.0% |
47.0% |
2.0% |
|
|
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
49% |
45% |
51% |
3% |
|
|
|
Female |
51% |
50% |
47% |
3% |
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
47.6% |
49.0% |
3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Race |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
69% |
31% |
64% |
3% |
2% |
|
|
Black |
20% |
94% |
3% |
1% |
2% |
|
|
Latino |
8% |
63% |
27% |
7% |
3% |
|
|
Asian |
2% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Other |
2% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Total |
101% |
45.2% |
46.9% |
2.8% |
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-29 |
13% |
59% |
33% |
5% |
3% |
|
|
30-44 |
25% |
49% |
46% |
4% |
1% |
|
|
45-64 |
47% |
47% |
51% |
3% |
1% |
|
|
65+ |
15% |
37% |
59% |
3% |
1% |
|
|
Total |
100% |
47.6% |
48.6% |
3.5% |
1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $30,000 |
19% |
65% |
29% |
5% |
1% |
|
|
$30-50,000 |
18% |
60% |
33% |
5% |
2% |
|
|
$50-75,000 |
19% |
45% |
48% |
4% |
3% |
|
|
$75-100,000 |
16% |
43% |
54% |
2% |
1% |
|
|
$100-200,000 |
20% |
35% |
61% |
3% |
1% |
|
|
$200,000 + |
8% |
25% |
72% |
2% |
1% |
|
|
Total |
100% |
47.6% |
47.2% |
3.7% |
1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No H.S. |
4% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
H.S. Grad |
18% |
55% |
40% |
3% |
2% |
|
|
Some College |
30% |
47% |
46% |
5% |
2% |
|
|
ColGrad |
28% |
40% |
56% |
2% |
2% |
|
|
Postgrad |
20% |
44% |
54% |
2% |
N/A |
|
|
Total |
100% |
44.0% |
47.5% |
3.0% |
1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
College Grad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48% |
41% |
55% |
4% |
|
|
|
No |
52% |
51% |
42% |
7% |
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
46.2% |
48.2% |
5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Party ID |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
44% |
86% |
10% |
3% |
1% |
|
|
Republican |
31% |
5% |
93% |
0% |
2% |
|
|
Independent |
25% |
28% |
61% |
8% |
3% |
|
|
Total |
100% |
46.4% |
48.5% |
3.3% |
1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liberal |
22% |
87% |
8% |
5% |
|
|
|
Moderate |
43% |
51% |
44% |
5% |
|
|
|
Conservative |
35% |
15% |
81% |
4% |
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
46.3% |
49.0% |
4.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voted in 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56% |
79% |
18% |
3% |
|
|
|
McCain |
38% |
3% |
93% |
4% |
|
|
|
Other |
3% |
35% |
65% |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Did not vote |
3% |
35% |
65% |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
Total |
100% |
47.5% |
49.3% |
3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Decided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% |
54% |
37% |
6% |
N/A |
|
|
Last Week |
15% |
54% |
37% |
6% |
N/A |
|
|
Last Month |
21% |
52% |
43% |
5% |
|
|
|
Before |
51% |
46% |
53% |
1% |
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
49.5% |
46.4% |
3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Decided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29% |
54% |
37% |
6% |
3% |
|
|
Before |
71% |
47% |
50% |
2% |
1% |
|
|
Total |
100% |
49.0% |
46.2% |
3.2% |
1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Decided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49% |
53% |
39% |
6% |
2% |
|
|
Before |
51% |
46% |
53% |
1% |
N/A |
|
|
Total |
100% |
49.4% |
46.1% |
3.5% |
1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19% |
77% |
19% |
4% |
|
|
|
Smaller Cities |
3% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
Suburbs |
63% |
41% |
54% |
5% |
|
|
|
Small Towns |
5% |
45% |
49% |
6% |
|
|
|
Rural |
10% |
29% |
65% |
6% |
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
45.6% |
46.6% |
4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22% |
72% |
23% |
5% |
|
|
|
Suburban |
63% |
41% |
54% |
5% |
|
|
|
Rural |
15% |
35% |
60% |
5% |
|
|
|
Total |
100% |
46.9% |
48.1% |
5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19% |
77% |
19% |
3% |
1% |
|
|
Cook Suburbs |
18% |
53% |
44% |
2% |
1% |
|
|
Collar Counties |
25% |
38% |
57% |
3% |
2% |
|
|
|
23% |
33% |
60% |
5% |
2% |
|
|
|
15% |
35% |
59% |
4% |
2% |
|
|
Total |
100% |
46.5% |
48.4% |
3.4% |
1.6% |
|